CEI Strategy
CEI Strategy
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
GlobalSurg & The NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
Community Engagement & Involvement
For GSU, this means working closely with community stakeholders in our LMICs. These stakeholders might be patients and their families, community leaders or generally anyone in the community affected by our surgical research.
To achieve this, we have developed the below outlined overarching CEI strategy – a flexible approach to reaching and establishing ongoing relationships with relevant community members.


Community Engagement and Involvement (CEI) at GSU
“…the process of working collaboratively with and through groups of people affiliated by geographic proximity, special interest, or similar situations to address issues affecting the well-being of those people”
– US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
The key building blocks are:
1. Each Hub employs a CEI Lead (e.g. a research nurse), who has been trained in best practice CEI according to the UNICEF standards and is responsible for recruitment, training and ongoing support of the community representatives
2. The community representatives are well-connected key stakeholders with reach into grassroots communities
3. The Hub CEI Lead and community representatives meet regularly to form the (virtual) CEI steering committee
4. The steering committee allows us to reach those in the community who are most affected by our research and ensurse they are empowered to contribute towards decision-making
All CEI activities are being captured and evaluated by the UK-based CEI Coordinator, who is also responsible for training, monitoring and shared learning.
Ghana PPI Community Engagement
‘The experiences of the patient and community contributors led to changes in the study protocol (TIGER) such as including women in the patient cohort for the trial, and allowed the GSU teams to confirm the relevance and acceptability of this trial.
These conversations also taught the team a lot about perceptions of health in rural communities, allowed the Ghanaian team to establish relationships with community leaders that can be utilised when future studies need input from the public, and has changed the minds of the Ghanaian research team about the importance of involving patients with research.’
Our CEI Case Studies
Our case studies showcase practical application of CEI in LMIC settings with focus on exploring best practice and highlighting challenges and barriers, as well as potential solutions. Learn about the tailored CEI activities.

CEI Case Study – Starfish: Stoma Care For Improvement Research: Epidemiologic study of stoma cases in The Philippines and qualitative research on the challenges of stoma care.

CEI Case Study – Starfish: Stoma Care For Improvement Research: Epidemiologic study of stoma cases in The Philippines and qualitative research on the challenges of stoma care.
Images from our Community Engagement Projects
Mangement Prog
Mangement Prog
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
The NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
Mangement Prog
In eget elit eget odio egestas luctus. Aenean vitae leo porta, vestibulum mauris ut, facilisis arcu. Pellentesque egestas ornare dui non interdum. Nullam a sollicitudin quam, ac bibendum leo. Etiam congue consequat metus quis egestas. Nulla quis faucibus orci. Fusce aliquet tincidunt ante vitae tincidunt. Fusce vitae eros eu nulla volutpat ultricies. Mauris dictum, nisi quis tincidunt egestas, mi nunc iaculis turpis, quis dignissim arcu felis a justo.
" Bringing together surgeons, researchers and policy makers to set the local research agenda according to patient need in LMIC and ensuring all patients have the opportunity to take part in our research. "
John Smith, Head of Research
NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery
Senior Directors Prog
Senior Directors Prog
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
The NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
Senior Directors Prog
In eget elit eget odio egestas luctus. Aenean vitae leo porta, vestibulum mauris ut, facilisis arcu. Pellentesque egestas ornare dui non interdum. Nullam a sollicitudin quam, ac bibendum leo. Etiam congue consequat metus quis egestas. Nulla quis faucibus orci. Fusce aliquet tincidunt ante vitae tincidunt. Fusce vitae eros eu nulla volutpat ultricies. Mauris dictum, nisi quis tincidunt egestas, mi nunc iaculis turpis, quis dignissim arcu felis a justo.
" Bringing together surgeons, researchers and policy makers to set the local research agenda according to patient need in LMIC and ensuring all patients have the opportunity to take part in our research. "
John Smith, Head of Research
NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery
Future Leaders Prog
Future Leaders Prog
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
The NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
Future Leaders Prog
The Future Leaders Programme produces new cohorts of surgical research leaders, aiming to provide increased sustainable research leadership capacity and capability.
This will be achieved through the following strands:
- MSc in Global Surgery: GSU Nigeria Hub based at University of Lagos has established an international masters programme.
- PhD in Clinical Sciences: established in GSU Ghana Hub (University of Clinical Sciences, Tamale) – the first of its kind across West Africa.
- MSc in Surgical Science:
15 Hub-UK fellowships offered and all near completion
Further fellowships to be offered to LMIC surgeon trainees from our partner countries.

" Bringing together surgeons, researchers and policy makers to set the local research agenda according to patient need in LMIC and ensuring all patients have the opportunity to take part in our research. "
John Smith, Head of Research
NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery
Data Centre
Data Centre
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
The NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
Data Centre
The GlobalSurg Data Centre aims to give our collaborators better access to the datasets collected during our international cohort studies. The centre is an online home for the collection, analysis, visulation and reporting of data in our Global Surgery projects. We hope to share data to establish best practice, and ultimately, to improve outcomes for surgical patients worldwide.
At the GlobalSurg Data Centre you can see real time updates on data entry from our current study – at the moment GlobalSurg 3 is collecting data on patients undergoing surgery for breast, gastric and colon cancers. Visit the GS3 in numbers page to see live updates on how many countries are registered to take part, how many teams are actively collecting data and how many patient records have been entered into the study.
As we complete cohort studies we will add applications that allow visualisation and interaction with the complete dataset (please be reassured that we not allow access to patient or hospital level data) – you can see an example of this by visiting the GS2 data explorer. Using this new application, any variable can be compared with any other variable – click the ‘Data’ tab to begin exploring!
We will also be blogging here about all things data – tips on data analysis, how to best present data – if you have a data-related topic you like us to cover, let us know by contacting us!


Education Centre
training.globalsurg.org
The GlobalSurg Education Centre provides online training and resources relevant to global surgical research. At the centre you will find open access training materials for our cohort studies and video tutorials on how to use REDCap – our online data entry platform.
We will also be adding modules related to undertaking research wherever you are in the world – these will be open access and freely available to all!

Education Centre Hubs
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nullam eu semper eros. Pellentesque sit amet nibh et urna sodales scelerisque et sed libero. Ut ante mi, lobortis imperdiet nunc pretium, varius pretium nulla. Etiam quis ipsum eu nunc commodo sollicitudin. Cras iaculis egestas magna, fringilla blandit felis finibus ac. In et eleifend dui. Proin eget volutpat orci. Phasellus a convallis elit. Curabitur ornare enim leo, at blandit metus rutrum vitae.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nullam eu semper eros. Pellentesque sit amet nibh et urna sodales scelerisque et sed libero. Ut ante mi, lobortis imperdiet nunc pretium, varius pretium nulla. Etiam quis ipsum eu nunc commodo sollicitudin. Cras iaculis egestas magna, fringilla blandit felis finibus ac. In et eleifend dui. Proin eget volutpat orci. Phasellus a convallis elit. Curabitur ornare enim leo, at blandit metus rutrum vitae.
" Bringing together surgeons, researchers and policy makers to set the local research agenda according to patient need in LMIC and ensuring all patients have the opportunity to take part in our research. "
John Smith, Head of Research
NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery
Health Economics
Health Economics
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
The NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
Health Economics
Health Economics is the study of how individuals, healthcare providers and governments make health and healthcare decisions in the presence of limited resources. Thus, it applies the general principles of economics to the allocation of scarce resources in health and healthcare. In limited resource settings, appropriate information on the relative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of health care interventions are vital to support decisions on resource allocation.
In collaboration with the NIHR Global Surgery Unit (GSU) Policy & Implementation Committee, health economic information will be used to guide and support decision making in low- and middle- income (LMIC) settings. To this end, the planned health economic evidence generation includes the undertaking of a range of different approaches such as systematic reviews, economic modelling, cost studies and economic evaluations alongside trials.
Health Economics Research

PROTECT SURG TRIAL
Surgical patients are at high risk of exposure to respiratory infection transmissions including coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and other complications. Despite this, some surgeries especially non-elective ones have to be performed even during the pandemic period which will likely increase post-operative pneumonia cases, hospital resource use and mortality rates.
The PROTECT Surg Trial has been planned to estimate the impact of interventions hypothesised to avert postoperative pulmonary complications during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is an international multicentre adaptive trial which will establish as quick as possible beneficial interventions, drop interventions with no evidence of effectiveness and introduce new interventions with potential of reducing pulmonary complications during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the initial design, the trial will assess the effectiveness of three interventions compared to normal practice (no trial drug): (1) lopinavir-Ritonavir (2) hydroxychloroquine and (3) a combination of Lopinavir-Ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine.

FALCON TRIAL
The FALCON trial looks into the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI) in low- and middle- income countries.
The health economics sub-study within FALCON is named KIWI (Key Resource Use In Wound Infection).
Surgical site infection (SSI) is a worldwide problem which has morbidity, mortality and financial consequences .Previous studies in LMICs on the costs of SSI have been limited by small sample size single-centre hospitals which did not capture costs occurring after hospital discharge. The lack of follow up is a problem as SSI can occur after discharge and costs associated with SSI have been shown to persist beyond 30 days. The main FALCON trial is assessing different treatment combinations to reduce Surgical Site Infection (SSI). The FALCON KIWI sub study is assessing the resource use and costs for patients with and without SSI across several hub countries.

KIWI STUDY
The FALCON KIWI sub study is assessing the resource use and costs for patients with and without SSI across several hub countries. KIWI includes resource use collection (via additional CRFs) up to the 30-day follow-up assessment for patients and extended follow-up for any patients with an ongoing wound infection up to 60 days post-surgery.’

CHEETAH TRIAL
The main CHEETAH trial is assessing whether the practice of using separate, sterile gloves and instruments to close wounds at the end of surgery can reduce surgical site infection at 30-days post-surgery for patients undergoing clean-contaminated, contaminated or dirty abdominal surgery, compared to current routine hospital practice.
Using information from FALCON KIWI and primary data collection in CHEETAH, the cost-effectiveness of the changing gloves/instruments prior to wound closure compared to current routine hospital practice will be assessed.

PENGUIN TRIAL
The PENGUIN trial is a 2 x 2 factorial, international pragmatic randomised trial. The trial aims to assess whether preoperative chlorhexidine mouthwash when compared to no-mouthwash-surgery can reduce incidence of post-operative pneumonia (POP) and whether perioperative liberal oxygen versus restrictive oxygen can reduce incidence surgical site infections (SSI) at 30-days among abdominal surgery patients.
Health Economics Activities with Pump Priming Studies at the Global Surgery Unit

LION STUDY
LION (LaparoscopIc Versus Open Appendectomy): Cost comparison in a lower- middle income setting
This study aims to compare the outcome and cost of conventional open and laparoscopic appendectomy for clinically confirmed, uncomplicated, acute appendicitis in a low resource setting. Although the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery has been investigated previously in high human development index (HDI) countries, similar studies are lacking in low and middle HDI countries.
Led by Dr Adewale Adisa at the NIHR hub in Nigeria, this study will compare outcomes following open and laparoscopic appendectomy in approximately 150 patients at 3 hospitals in Nigeria.

TIGER STUDY
TIGER (Task shifting Inguinal hernia Repair between surgeons and technicians): development of a randomised trial in low and middle income countries
Can technicians perform mesh inguinal hernia repair safely and cost-effectively in rural surgical settings in low and middle income countries?
This pilot trial aims to investigate delivery of a standardised, measurable training programme for technicians to perform a mesh inguinal hernia repair.
Bringing together surgeons, researchers and policy makers to set the local research agenda according to patient need in LMIC and ensuring all patients have the opportunity to take part in our research.
Guidelines
Guidelines
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
The NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
Guidelines
Many clinical guidelines are developed by high‐income country institutions with little consideration given to either the evidence base for interventions in LMICs, or the specific challenges LMIC health systems may face in implementing recommendations.
Through a Delphi exercise, the GSU prioritised topics for global surgery guideline development and work was undertaken across the research Hub network to develop top prioritised guidelines. The results of the Delphi exercise were reported in BJS.
A key aspect of the work we do revolves around the notion of informing national guidelines through reaching for example national surgical societies and health service providers. With our hub directors, we have established a consensus process for refining rationalised ‘Essential Surgical Guidelines’ to support care delivery across LMICs. In response to COVID-19, for example, a range of related projects international including surgical guidelines have been undertaken and published.
Global Surgical Guidelines for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections
Surgical site infection (SSI) is the commonest postoperative complication in abdominal surgery. SSI causes patients to experience pain and delays return to normal activities such as work. Additional SSI-related health costs can cause financial hardship, particularly for the most vulnerable patients in LMICs. Treatment of SSI is increasingly challenging due to the rise of antibiotic resistance, which occurs in up to 46% of LMIC patients. This places a strong focus on preventing SSI from occurring in the first place.
We have worked with surgeons representing 13 LMICs to collaboratively adapt existing high income country guidance to produce a guideline that reflects the challenges of delivering surgery in LMICs, and allows health providers to prioritise implementation of key interventions that are most likely to benefit patients.
The ‘Global Surgery Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection’, published in BJS, has identified practical steps that all hospitals should urgently take to both reduce avoidable infections and the spread of antimicrobial resistance. In addition, a further three ‘desirable’ recommendations are made in the guideline. It is recognised that worldwide some hospitals may lack the necessary resources to immediately implement these interventions, in which case they should plan strategies to introduce these interventions in the future.
Global Guidance for Surgical Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic


Global Guidance for surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic
Surgeons worldwide urgently need guidance on how to deliver surgical services safely and effectively during the COVID-19 pandemic. The key outcomes from a scoping search conducted to identify published articles relating to management of surgical patients during pandemics are published in the BJS and outlined in the poster below.
Bringing together surgeons, researchers and policy makers to set the local research agenda according to patient need in LMIC and ensuring all patients have the opportunity to take part in our research.
Pump Priming
Pump Priming
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
The NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
Pump Priming
The NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery is committed to building and strengthening research capacity in areas specifically relevant to patients in our low and middle income (LMIC) partner countries.
Each year as part of our annual research prioritisation workshop, researchers from our partner countries are invited to submit research proposals for consideration for seed funding from the NIHR Global Surgery Unit.
The successful bids receive pump-priming funding together with mentoring from academics across the Unit in order to develop and conduct their research projects. It is anticipated that this initial funding will generate early pilot data that will be used to inform applications for future grant funding and so develop these projects in to larger studies and trials across the NIHR Global Surgery Unit network.
Studies selected to receive pump-priming funding are outlined below:
Pump Priming Research
STARFISH STUDY
SToma cARe For Improvement reSearcH (STARFISH): Epidemiologic study of stoma cases in Lower- and Middle-Income Countries and qualitative research on the challenges on stoma care.
The STARFISH study uses a mixed methods approach to assess the burden and challenges of stoma care in low and middle income settings.
Based at the Unit’s Centre in the Philippines and led by Dr Maria Carmela Lapitan at the University of the Philippines in Manilla, Starfish comprises 3 separate sub-studies:
1. A survey at selected healthcare facilities to collect data on stoma incidence, types, indications and complications.
2. Focus groups and one-to-one interviews with patients, carers and health care providers involved in stoma care
3. Development of a questionnaire for stoma patients in low and middle income settings to collect standardised data on stoma care
TIGER STUDY
TIGER (Task shifting Inguinal hernia Repair between surgeons and technicians): development of a randomised trial in low and middle income countries
Can technicians perform mesh inguinal hernia repair safely and cost-effectively in rural surgical settings in low and middle income countries?
This pilot trial aims to investigate delivery of a standardised, measurable training programme for technicians to perform a mesh inguinal hernia repair.
Educational Visits
As part of the pump-priming funding stream, the Global Surgery Unit is supporting educational visits between our international partners, sharing knowledge and experience.
Honey wound dressings for the management of chronic wounds in Ghana
Honey is well documented to have anti-bacterial and anti-fungal properties, however there is currently insufficient evidence to demonstrate that honey wound dressings are effective in the treatment of chronic wounds.
Medical grade honey is currently available but not yet in use in Ghana. This project funded an educational trip for Dr Edwin Yenli and Dr Etch Ighohwo from the NIHR Global Surgery Unit hub in Ghana to visit colleagues at our South African hub in order to observe wound care at specialised units.
To read a full report on Dr Yenli and Dr Ighohwo’s visit please click here.
The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist
In the 10th anniversary year of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC), this project aims to determine usage and compliance with the WHO SSC in referral and district hospitals in Rwanda and Malawi.
Led in partnership by Dr JC Allen Ingabire from The NIHR Global Surgery Unit hub in Rwanda and Dr Vanessa Msosa at Kamuzu Central Hospital in Malawi, the study will audit knowledge and usage of the WHO SSC amongst approximately 1000 theatre users at 24 rural and district hospitals in Rwanda and 10 in Malawi.
During a defined 3-day data collection period, operations taking place in general surgical and obstetrics & gynaecology theatres will be audited to investigate if the WHO SSC is available to the whole surgical team and being used to record key variables during every operation performed.
LION STUDY
LION (LaparoscopIc Versus Open Appendectomy): Cost comparison in a lower- middle income setting
This study aims to compare the outcome and cost of conventional open and laparoscopic appendectomy for clinically confirmed, uncomplicated, acute appendicitis in a low resource setting. Although the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery has been investigated previously in high human development index (HDI) countries, similar studies are lacking in low and middle HDI countries.
Led by Dr Adewale Adisa at the NIHR hub in Nigeria, this study will compare outcomes following open and laparoscopic appendectomy in approximately 150 patients at 3 hospitals in Nigeria.
Burns Care
Burns are a significant contributor to the burden of disease in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Although current guidelines recommend treatment in specialised treatment centres, such centres are few or non-existent in many LMIC settings.
Led by Dr Chikwendu Ede and Dr Rachel Moore from the NIHR Global Surgery Unit hub in South Africa, this is a prospective observational study comparing outcomes of burns treatments between non-specialised and specialised burns units. Information on 90 day mortality will be collected over a 6 month period at up to 9 non-specialised hospitals treating adult burns patients and compared to outcomes for patients at a dedicated burns unit at Chris Hani Baragwanarth Academic Hospital in Soweto, Johannesburg.
Wound dressing practices to decrease Surgical Site infections in low and middle income countries
Led by Dr Faustin Ntirenganya and Dr Christophe Mpirimbanyi from the NIHR Global Surgery Unit hub in Rwanda, this mixed methods study assesses knowledge, attitudes and practices around surgical wound dressing amongst nurses, general practitioners and surgeons in Rwanda.
The study, conducted at 3 hospitals in Rwanda, will determine types of commonly used dressings and indications for dressing change, evaluate cost implications of wound dressings, and investigate patients’ and health professionals ‘beliefs / perspectives’ regarding the feasibility of a future RCT.
Primary outcome measure will be surgical site infection at 30 days; secondary outcome measures will include length of hospital stay, dressing costs, patient satisfaction and complication rates.
Abdominal Tuberculosis in children – pattern and treatment outcomes
This study led by the NIHR Global Surgery Unit hub in India examines the pattern of abdominal tuberculosis in children and investigates the effectiveness of various treatment regimens, exploring the response of paediatric patients to medical intervention alone, to a surgical approach alone, and to a combined approach.
This involves a retrospective and follow up study of all abdominal tuberculosis cases treated as in-patients in the departments of paediatrics and paediatric surgery at the Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana from 1st August 2007 to 31st July 2017. Anonymised data on these patients is being studied from medical records and includes information related to demographics, socioeconomic and nutritional status, clinical findings, investigations, radiological findings and treatment related data. Further approaches such as patient interviews are being employed to supplement the available data.
Bringing together surgeons, researchers and policy makers to set the local research agenda according to patient need in LMIC and ensuring all patients have the opportunity to take part in our research.
Cancer
Cancer
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
The NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
Cancer
Surgery often offers the best chance of cure, particularly in early-stage disease. It is estimated that 45 million surgical procedures are needed each year worldwide, yet fewer than 25% of patients with cancer have access to safe, affordable, and timely surgery.
Death rates from cancer are falling in high income countries, but continue to rise in LMICs. Up to 1.5% of GDP is lost due to cancer in some LMIC regions. In 2018, GlobalSurg Collaborative conducted the biggest ever international study into surgical outcomes for cancer patients. 3000 collaborators in 84 countries collected evidence from <15,000 patients.
Cancer Research

EAGLE STUDY
The ESCP Safe-anastomosis Programme in Colorectal Surgery (EAGLE) is an international, cluster randomised-sequence study of a Safe-anastomosis Quality Improvement Intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy and ileocaecal resection
Anastomotic leak is a severe, potentially life-threatening complication following right colectomy. Internationally, anastomotic leak occurs after 8% of right colectomies. Prospective cohort data demonstrate that patient selection, intraoperative factors, and technical variation are risk factors for anastomotic leak.

CRANE STUDY
CRANE is a feasibility study of a nutritional intervention to improve outcomes after cancer surgery in low-income countries. It aims to identify and validate a nutritional screening tool; identify a low cost sustainable nutritional intervention; and investigate recruitment and retention, data collection methods and the acceptability of a nutritional intervention to improve outcomes after cancer surgery in low- and middle-income countries.
The health economics component looks at the feasibility of collecting economic data and the design of resource use forms for a full trial. The health economics is particularly important essential given the importance of cost effectiveness in developing a long term sustainable solution.

CROCODILE STUDY
‘Little is known about colorectal cancer treatment delivery in India and the associated costs. CROCODILE aims to identify financial and non-financial barriers for colorectal cancer treatment compliance in India.’
Bringing together surgeons, researchers and policy makers to set the local research agenda according to patient need in LMIC and ensuring all patients have the opportunity to take part in our research.
Covid-19
Covid-19
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
The NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
Covid-19
COVID-19 has highlighted the limited resilience of global surgery. Our research has shown that 50 million operations were cancelled in the first pandemic wave. Re-starting surgery in the face of pre-existing systemic issues has been a major global challenge, and has been only partially successful to date.
LMICs already faced a burden of low surgery volumes, lacking at least 143 million operations per year. An increase in capacity is urgently needed to tackle the expanding non-communicable disease burden, whilst providing resilient services that can survive external forces.
Our use of existing and new data produce policy influencing analyses that can directly inform the recovery and expansion of surgery at a global scale.
In November 2020 GSU published its first report on how to tackle surgery in the COVID-19 era and how surgical services may be reorganised to deal with the aftermath of the pandemic (visit: https://redcap.link/siureport)
Covid-19 Research

PROTECT SURG TRIAL
Surgical patients are at high risk of exposure to respiratory infection transmissions including coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and other complications. Despite this, some surgeries especially non-elective ones have to be performed even during the pandemic period which will likely increase post-operative pneumonia cases, hospital resource use and mortality rates.
The PROTECT Surg Trial has been planned to estimate the impact of interventions hypothesised to avert postoperative pulmonary complications during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is an international multicentre adaptive trial which will establish as quick as possible beneficial interventions, drop interventions with no evidence of effectiveness and introduce new interventions with potential of reducing pulmonary complications during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the initial design, the trial will assess the effectiveness of three interventions compared to normal practice (no trial drug): (1) lopinavir-Ritonavir (2) hydroxychloroquine and (3) a combination of Lopinavir-Ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine.
CovidSurg is a platform of studies aiming to explore the impact of COVID-19 in surgical patients and services. Our studies are designed and delivered by an international collaborating group of surgeons and anaesthetists which reached more than 80 countries.

COVIDSURG
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who need surgery are a challenging group. Capturing real-world data and sharing international experience will inform the management of this complex group of patients who undergo surgery throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, improving their clinical care.
Primary aim
- To determine 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19 infection who undergo surgery. This will inform future risk stratification, decision making, and patient consent.

COVIDSURG - CANCER
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
Any centre performing elective cancer surgery affected by COVID-19 could participate in this study. Investigators could choose one or more cancer types from their centre from which to upload data. This study could be performed prospectively, retrospectively or using a mixed model, dependent on the phase of COVID-19 infection in that team’s hospital.
Primary aim
- To evaluate the 30-day postoperative pulmonary complication rate following elective cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

COVIDSURG WEEK
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
CovidSurg Week is an international multi-centre prospective cohort study in which patients from all specialities undergoing a surgical procedure done in an operating theatre could be included (any SARS-CoV 2 status).
Primary aim
- To determine the optimal timing for surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection.

COVIDSURG 3 - OMICRON
Improving surgical outcomes through collaborative research
With the emergence of the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern, there is currently little evidence regarding disease severity in both vaccinated and unvaccinated patients (including in surgical patients), nor is there data to guide patient risk stratification during Omicron COVID-19 waves.
This new study aims to provide renewed rapid data to guide global practice during Omicron COVID-19 waves.
CovidSurg-3 has two separate components:
- Patient-level component: Collection of outcome data for patients with peri-operative SARS-CoV-2.
- Hospital-level component: Collection of aggregated case-mix data. Hospitals in countries with low community SARS-CoV-2 infection rates can contribute towards this component.
Primary aim
- To determine 30-day mortality in patients with peri-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection. This will inform future risk stratification, decision making, and patient consent.
Key Documents
- Study Protocol can be accessed here
- Study Protocol appendix can be accessed here
- Data collection sheet (patient level) can be accessed here
- Data collection sheet (hospital level) can be accessed here
Key Documents for Patients
A range of documents for patients who may be either planning for or about to undergo an operation during the COVID-19 pandemic can be accessed here.
Bringing together surgeons, researchers and policy makers to set the local research agenda according to patient need in LMIC and ensuring all patients have the opportunity to take part in our research.